American Empire – Resisting the Government’s Indoctrination System
As a Muslim American who reverted to Islam out of the love I felt for the teachings contained within the Quran I do not feel I can send my son to a school that teaches the things America has put in classrooms and school libraries. This is far from my only concern in American schools. I also can’t in good conscience send my son into a gun free zone with nobody to protect him in a time where people are regularly committing shootings targeted at schools. Plus abuse from other kids is rampant, I don't want my kid around American gang culture and American culture generally. Not to mention the gender mixing aspect that would require money I don't have to avoid (i.e. private school tuition & relocation because no such school exists near me).
My son is nonverbal and developmentally disabled. He can't tell me or his mother what happened at school for 8-hours if we send him there. To the right is a video where a 6 year old special needs boy was raped by an 11 year old boy on a school bus. Her son is intellectually disabled, he couldn't communicate this to her even though does talk, the only reason she found out is because her son came home without his backpack one day. This led to the school looking on the bus cameras, something my town doesn't have on its school buses, where they witnessed the assault talk place while attempting to locate the victim's bag. What if her son's bag had made it home? My son would never be able to communicate what happened in this scenario and there would be no camera footage to find out retroactively.
This is far from the only concerning story of special needs children being abused by their caretakers or while in their care. In another concerning story a nonverbal special needs student was punched in the face by the grandfather of another student on board his school bus. The parents/grandparents of students being highly involved at schools is very common in my area. This wasn't the only such case: A caretaker will not be criminally charged for assault despite school bus surveillance video that showed her slap a 13-year-old girl with a severe intellectual disability and then drag her across the floor of the bus. So in America even with video evidence of child abuse by the person responsible for this child's safety no justice is served.
Aside from safety there is the religious aspect of this conversation. American schools have fully bought in to the alphabet community's ideology. They are teaching students that they must be tolerant towards these things and they justify this with theories presented as facts. Are kids born gay? I don't believe they are and science tends to agree on that. Sexuality is determined by a variety of environmental factors and deviance (LGBTQ) often correlate with ACE (adverse childhood experiences) scores higher than in the heterosexual population.
The study stopped short of saying that sexual and physical abuse directly cause homosexuality, instead saying they cannot disentangle the causal direction because the sequencing of maltreatment and emerging sexuality is difficult to ascertain. This means in the Western academic view. without full surveillance of a child's entire childhood by researchers. they will never be able to confirm that the direct link in their data is a causal one rather than a coincidental correlation. The reason all modern Western institutions stop short of making claims on sexuality / gender deviance is because of the intense backlash medical researchers will receive should they be represented as "homophobic", "transphobic", or otherwise discriminatory.
The “Equality Act”, currently a bill passed the House of Representatives and in the US Senate, would also force individuals to speak messages that violate their beliefs under the threat of punishment. Dr. Nicholas Meriwether was disciplined by Shawnee State University for declining to refer to a male student as a woman. He offered to refer to the student by first or last name only, in order to respect both the student and his own beliefs, but this did not satisfy the university, which still punished him. If University professors cannot even hold religious views in their classrooms with regards to biological sex and the grossly misrepresented research on transgenderism how are we to believe that these colleges allow research contrary to the LGBT agenda? The data they use to justify the false belief that a person can "change genders" by getting their genitals mutilated and taking hormones always is focused on a person's self-proclaimed "gender identity" and the way 'gender affirming care' affects their psychology and life.
These studies do not even attempt to answer the question "how does cutting your male genitalia off and having a hole surgically made for homosexual intercourse make you a woman?" it only attempts to discover if the person's idea of themselves as the other sex is persistent, fluid, or desists. The idea of themselves is completely disconnected from reality because clothes, makeup, interests, and other superficial things aren't criteria for sex. Crossdressing and roleplay is abhorrent and disgusting in its own right but the attempt to force society to take part in this collective delusion must stop.
On 24 April 2022 President Biden said: “Our schools should be places where everyone is safe and safe to be themselves. But across the country of late from our — some of our friends on the extreme right, LBG [LGBTQ] students and teachers are under attack from hateful laws. I’ve directed Secretary Cardona to strengthen protections of Title IX to protect both students and school employees from sexual assault, harassment, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity."
Notice his statement specifically is designed towards these sexual deviants and gender role-players. He shows no concern for the safety of a religious person to 'be themselves', he doesn't care that Muslim and Christian Americans are being forced to live in opposition to their faith, the only that matters to America's democrats is that society accepts "marginalized" groups of sexual deviants and mentally ill crossdressers. The rallying cry of progressives in the modern age is "protect trans children" but how are their kids getting these false notions about gender identity being relative and sexuality preferences in the first place? Kids shouldn't be seeing sex, including heterosexual sex, at all. They aren't coming up with the idea of being "born in the wrong body" before they have even a basic understanding of biology and reproduction on their own. They are being taught, encouraged even, to believe in this awful gender cult and when it isn't starting in the home the idea is usually coming from their American education.
Truthfully, for Muslims, does it actually matter what science or society says on the cause of homosexuality or transgenderism? Muslims believe morality is based on rules and directions given to people by Allah. What does Allah and his Nabi (saw)say about homosexuality?
إِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ الرِّجَالَ شَهْوَةً مِنْ دُونِ النِّسَاءِ ۚ بَلْ أَنْتُمْ قَوْمٌ مُسْرِفُونَ
"Indeed you come to men with desire instead of women! Indeed, you are a profligate lot."
إِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ الرِّجَالَ شَهْوَةً مِنْ دُونِ النِّسَاءِ ۚ بَلْ أَنْتُمْ قَوْمٌ مُسْرِفُونَ
"What! Of all people do you come to males, abandoning your wives your Lord has created for you? Indeed, you are a transgressing lot."
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا غُنْدَرٌ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ قَالَ لَعَنَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم الْمُتَشَبِّهِينَ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ بِالنِّسَاءِ، وَالْمُتَشَبِّهَاتِ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ بِالرِّجَالِ. تَابَعَهُ عَمْرٌو أَخْبَرَنَا شُعْبَةُ.
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) cursed those men who are in the similitude (assume the manners) of women and those women who are in the similitude (assume the manners) of men.
حَدَّثَنَا زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَامِرٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ بِلاَلٍ، عَنْ سُهَيْلٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ لَعَنَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم الرَّجُلَ يَلْبَسُ لِبْسَةَ الْمَرْأَةِ وَالْمَرْأَةَ تَلْبَسُ لِبْسَةَ الرَّجُلِ .
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) cursed the man who dressed like a woman and the woman who dressed like a man.
It is clearly forbidden within Islam to have Zina. Zina, for the non Muslims reading this, is illegal sexual intercourse forbidden by Islam. This includes a variety of things including homosexuality, premarital sex, adultery, beastiality, and rape. While homosexuality is one major concern with the American education system due to the increasing influence the alphabet community has over the Democratic Party, but it is far from the only concern. In American culture kids are expected to gender mix.
Both me and my wife were not properly prepared by our families for the realities of relationships and the tremendous value of modesty and marriage. Our son is fortunate to live under the American economy but with parents who hold moral values contrary to the degraded, godless values of American culture. This is because of our belief in Islam. The vast majority of Christians (we live in a large Christian majority Parish) do not object to their kids dating, kissing, having relationships, or in many cases even having sex with other kids they know. You can't expect them to stand up for their faith or ethical beliefs because they traded away the sincerity of their religion in favor of the nation's values of maximizing personally liberty and submission to the democratic system long ago.
It is worth mentioning that Americans get divorced more than they get married, and they are both marrying and divorcing less according to this year's data. My wife's parents are divorced and this had great negative effect on her childhood. I know from her stories, and the stories of friends, that divorce can really permanently alter a child's perception and trajectory in life in many cases. But in America, where 61% of Americans identify as feminists (and a larger percent of those in education and government), divorce is seen as normal and even celebrated in many cases. Susan B. Anthony, one of the pioneers of the feminist movement, was quoted saying "I do not consider divorce an evil by any means. It is just as much a refuge for women married to brutal men as Canada was to the slaves of brutal masters". This suggests that divorces are women escaping abusive husbands but is that the reality in America?
According to data only 24% of marriages end because of domestic violence. Far more often it is due to corruption inherent in the American culture. Infidelity, lack of commitment, and "getting married too young" indicate a sick view of sex and marriage. Infidelity being rampant speaks for itself but the other reasons have clear sociological implications. "Getting married too young" is Generation X's (1965-1980; our parents) way of saying they should have had more relationships and sex before they settled into a committed stable marriage. "Lack of commitment" has broader sociological implications regarding the lack of maturity, religious values, and overall selfishness of today's American. Either the person answering is initiating the divorce because they can't live with their partners lack of interest in the relationship or their own desire to be out of the relationship to pursue other relationships/lifestyles.
This is the natural result of the feminist movement. If women are in the workplace they aren't teaching the children they had with their husband. If this relationship with her husband & children is damaged by the lack of time and energy left to properly provide care, in addition to the affects of stress from her career and marriage, her family suffers as a result. Women used to take pride in their role as mothers and wives, and men cherished them for it and worked hard to be able to provide for them and their children. In the modern American culture women are encouraged to dress immodestly, demand a lot from their boyfriends, 'upgrade' from one relationship to another without shame, and be "sexually liberated" beyond which either gender should ever be comfortable with. Men are seen as 'insecure' for being protective of their partner, many men adopting labels like "poly" as knowing cuckolds that are in relationships with women that have many current partners.
This received some pushback that resulted in young men flocking to traditionalist masculine influencers like Andrew Tate, but for the most part seems to be the new paradigm for America's foreseeable future.
The likelihood of a resurgence of traditionalist values regarding sex and marriage becomes increasingly unlikely with the emergence of the internet sex industry (OnlyFans, pornography, prostitution) that allows men easy access to masturbation material and encourages them to see women like objects to have sex with and leave in the past. This also has become a easy source of revenue for American women willing to make easy money from offering sex to "Simps" who spend money for sexual content and attention from women.
This revenue stream is so easy to access that it has even become commonplace in many marriages for a wife to be running an account on OnlyFans where she sells nude, if not more explicit, content of herself to men online. This view of women in the modern American psyche, a view feminism unintentionally played a major contributing role in fostering, has made the vast majority of women fall outside of the criteria for marriage to a pious conservative male. The complete lack of arranged marriages or any other social structure facilitating the partnering of religious conservative men to religious conservative women has created an inherent distrust.
This is because the 'redpill' movement portrays all women as immodest attention seeking opportunists absent loyalty or accountability. They tell real horror stories of men who married women without properly vetting her sexual history or did inquire but were lied to. These women do exist, and this is a serious and increasingly common phenomenon, but their solution to exit the institutions of courtship or marriage and use pornography or hook-up apps to fulfill sexual needs is awful for society and women generally. They suggest you just focus on financial success and use that for sexual success which only moves American society further from the teachings of Allah and the institution of marriage that provided stable families historically. The only way America can heal is through turning back to God, and I don't see an Islamic States of America coming anytime soon.
The Origins & Purpose of the Education System in the United States
History
The Prussian education system is the model for education in many modern nations, including the United States. It is, essentially, a model of mandatory education, in which all members of a country must attend school up to a certain level.
The system was developed in the 18th century. The Kingdom of Prussia funded their school system with taxes, rather than charging students, allowing all citizens to attend for free. At the same time, they made attendance of their schools compulsory. It included eight years of mandatory schooling that attempted to fully prepare students for the modern world. This educational system instructed students on basic educational concepts, such as mathematics, writing, and reading. At the same time, it also taught things like obedience, duty to country, and the nation's view of ethics.. It should be noted that the ruling elites in Prussia, comprising perhaps 0.5% of the population, continued to educate their own children by the “old” system of education, through tutoring and/or in exclusive private schools. In other words, their own children continued to receive a proper, classical education. The root of the old system is the so-called “Trivium,” i.e. comprising grammar, logic and rhetoric. Properly taught, they allow a person to be self-reliant. In this way, they intended to guarantee that their children would continue to be the ruling elites of Prussia.
In 1914, The National Education Association alarmed by the activity of the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations stated in their annual meeting : “We view with alarm the activity of the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations—agencies not in any way responsible to the people—in their efforts to control the policies of our State educational institutions, to fashion after their conception and to standardize our courses of study, and to surround the institutions with conditions which menace true academic freedom and defeat the primary purpose of democracy as heretofore preserved inviolate in our common schools, normal schools, and universities.”
Compulsory schooling in the United States began in the nineteenth century with Horace Mann, the first Massachusetts Secretary of Education, appointed in 1837. While employed by the Massachusetts Board of Education, Horace Mann traveled to Germany to study the Prussian education system, which itself had been developed as a means to subdue and control populations which the Prussian army had recently invaded. Prussian teachers were literal military occupiers, whose job was both to teach imperial German nationalism and to remove Polish identity and language.
“Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished … When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
Johann Gottlieb Fichte, German Philosopher
The Ford Foundation (Ford Motors), The Rockefeller Foundation (Standard Oil), and especially The Carnegie Foundation (Carnegie Steel Company) were the key contributors that shaped the character of public schools and their curricula. If the Prussian military designed the manner of instruction, fossil-fuel industrialists defined its contents.
Modern Application
The American education system was designed to keep the ruling elites in power by encouraging the masses to be obedient nationalists that conform to their country's culture. The elites who fashioned the education system were not interested in educating a nation of citizens capable of self-government. They were interested in creating an obedient citizenry who supported the state and would give them a better chance to win any future wars. Only a few American schools still properly teach the Trivium and you can get a pretty good idea of which schools do so by finding out where leading politicians and other ruling elites send their own children. Elite expensive east-coast boarding schools like Philips Andover, St. Paul’s and Milton Academy come to mind. But most schools, including virtually all public schools, do not teach the Trivium. The national Common Core initiative that controls public education takes us even further away from it.
In America military recruiters prowl public high schools looking for naïve young people who haven't found their calling in life yet to entice into serving America's war machine. Gang culture, mostly due to media's glorification of it, is popular in America's public schools among the youth. Kids regularly are getting caught concealing handguns in school and drug abuse is rampant in the US at a time when the drugs are less safe than ever before due to the fentanyl crises. All of this inside of state-funded compulsory indoctrination centers that were designed to create obedient & dependent citizens as ironic as it that is. A study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania has found that closing poor-performing schools produces an unexpected benefit: greater public safety. By examining the targeted wind-down of 29 Philadelphia schools between 2011 and 2013 — a major shakeup of roughly 10 percent of the city’s school buildings — the authors found that crime rates dropped significantly following the closures. Violent crime, ranging from robberies to murder, fell by 30 percent, the analysis found.
These schools teach Western feminist ideology, a selective narrative of contemporary history that hides America's crimes and vilifies it's victims, and while they condemn 'slut-shaming' and 'homophobia' they don't protect the right to one's religion. Mockery of chaste and fundamentalist believers is a peer-enforced method of the accomplishing the system's intent of cultural conformity among it's citizens. Part of the Western globalist agenda is ensuring that children remain under the influence of the state through this mandatory education system where they are exposed to things contrary to their family's culture and religion. Ultimately this system; where boys and girls gender-mix for 8 hours per day for approximately fourteen years of the first eighteen years of their life, was always meant to destroy individual freedom, the institution of family, and self-reliance throughout America's population. This culminates in the child's enrollment in University where they take out enormous loans for degrees that don't ensure entry to, much less success in, their desired career field. Finally after being stripped of their religion, their financial independence, and their chastity / trust in the other gender they are completely reliant on government welfare programs and employment in the rigged corporatist economy. In the American economy if you are not financially successful you end up getting taken advantage of in poverty traps and low-paying jobs that take their toll on the body and the mind. You either buy into 'Grind culture' or you give up on your future and end up part of the growing homeless epidemic or in prison. If you do buy into 'The Grind', as I did for years, you can end up prioritizing some job where you are too overworked and under-payed over your responsibility to your family and Allah resulting in depression and dysfunction.
But why would a free country choose a system that is oppressive to the average man but protects the economic and political elites? The Rockefeller Influence on the Education System In the U.S, industrialists like John D. Rockefeller poured a significant amount of investment into education system. He created the General Education Board at the ultimate cost of $129 million and provided major funding for schools across the nation and was very influential in shaping the school system.
He didn’t exactly conceal his interest and motive in being actively involved in promoting the widespread adoption of the education system and once stated “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers."
"We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply…"
Frederick T.Gates, General Education Board member & Business advisor to Rockefeller
Conclusion
While public education isn't inherently bad the system in the US is not set up for the students' best interests, but instead is designed to mold them into being useful tools to the owners of industry and the political class. Kids are not being taught maturity, responsibility, good habits, ethics, or virtually any useful trade. They learn some useful skills like mathematics and science but for the most part the US school system exists to destroy deviation from the American culture. American feminist ideology has been weaponized against Americans to destroy family, chastity, and marriage. Libertarian philosophy has been used to justify the acceptance of sexual deviancy and substance abuse. American schools are extremely dangerous, which is especially true for special needs children, and they corrupt the youth while justifying it as a social good for the average citizen. Muslim American parents are put in an extremely tough position when they do not have the financial ability to send their children to an Islamic learning center but face judgement from society for not assimilating by sending their children to public school. Freedom of religion is intended to be a protected right of all citizens, given by God not man, according to the US constitution. Muslims without the means to pay for private/Islamic schools it is obligatory upon us to seek out alternatives like homeschooling. The Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
“Each of you is a shepherd and each of you is responsible for his flock. The ruler is a shepherd and is responsible for his flock. A man is the shepherd of his family and is responsible for his flock. A woman is the shepherd of her husband’s household and is responsible for her flock.”
Sahih Muslim
Sources
https://adflegal.org/article/heres-how-equality-act-threatens-your-freedom
https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/safe_school_laws/discrimination
https://www.lgbtmap.org/img/maps/citations-schools-bullying.pdf
https://www.heritage.org/religious-liberty/commentary/equality-act-would-cancel-religious-freedom
https://fee.org/articles/the-history-and-results-of-our-disastrous-public-school-system-part-i/
https://rebeleducator.co/the-military-industrial-history-of-american-public-education/
https://medium.com/the-mission/one-man-created-the-education-system-holding-you-back-c50c39496023
https://www.the74million.org/article/15-charts-that-made-us-think-differently-about-schools-in-2019/
Comments