AMERICAN EMPIRE - THE GOVERNMENT'S CLAIM TO YOUR CHILDREN
He Maybe Commander-in-Chief but That is Outside of His Authority
Continuing the traditions of his predecessors Biden has continued the evil imperialist, Zionist policies that have placed America at odds with the Muslim world.
The authority of parents over their own children is not one that exists by the acts or protection of government, but rather is something that throughout history you can find in almost every region of the world. This is because it was not government that designed procreation, but God. So when Biden claims that parents are not what is best for children I say we believe him that this is what he believes. When people ignore government clearly indicating the intention of infringing on rights bestowed upon man by God history tells us that governments act on that intention.
Although historically rights violations came in the form of the government physically inflicting it's will on it's people, things often take a different form today. In places like Germany where their version of Child Protective Services is already abducting Muslim children because of cultural differences (ie spanking, homeschooling, anti-lgbt fundamentalist religious teachings, etc) it is already common for people to abandon their own children to the state through drop boxes [source]. This is because the education system was always designed to tear apart the family unit; put children in the control of the modern nation-state rather than their parent's control, create a subdued class of obedient workers that do not question liberal ideas, and ultimately remove belief in God from Western society.
The progressive feminist movement was always part of accomplishing this goal in the sense that it allowed the government to set the precedent of having most children in it's care for education for about 8 hours per day by getting the mother, who previously would have been the child's mentor and caretaker, into the work place and sexually liberated where she will not be a desirable marriage prospect. Industrialization the cause, indoctrination the method, complete dysfunction the result.
As far back as 1998 our government has allowed the negligent killing of babies by their parents in cases where the pregnant was a promiscuous teenage white girl. Now it's considered offensive and antiquated to oppose abortion from the position that a woman should not be having sex outside of marriage, but it's not at all socially discouraged for a girl in her late teenage years to get pregnant and give the baby up for adoption or kill it in the womb.
The Western liberal mind is a twisted, godless perspective where the only moral value is absolute personal liberty as long as another human isn't being victimized through violence. They see an objection based on divine authority to the unnatural (such as the belief homosexuality or bestiality is wrong) as immoral and indicative of low intelligence and superstition, but in the very next breath they argue a person can be trapped in the wrong gender body. Trans* ideology very much requires a type of religious faith and the cherishing of absolute personal liberty above protecting purity and functional institutions like marriage and chastity. Originally, when American Christians accepted the homosexuals, the reasoning was "love is love" and that no actual harm was being done to society through homosexuality. After all, the dominant belief is that people are "born gay" or at the very least know they are gay while still prepubescent. But if this is true then why is the rate of LGBTQ+ amongst children rising dramatically?
"Protect Gay/Bi/Trans* Kids"
The idea that "trans kids" or "gay kids" need to be protected is based on the dominant belief mentioned prior (that a person is born homosexual or it develops very early in life) and that accepting them offers them the best possibility of having a "good" life. I disagree entirely. A life lived in rebellion against God, confused and perverted by early exposure to modern liberal ideas of sexuality, is not a "good" life. A popular survey found that 48% of "trans" identified people attempted suicide, and 59% admitted to at least considering it. Does that sound like a good life to you? How about the fact a record high 7.2% of the US population identifies as LGBT, do you think that is indicative of a functional society? I don't.
But the progressive alphabet community will certainly swear to you that all modern science indicates that affirming a child's divergence through "gender identity" is the only way to help them! They will demand you find studies to refute their assertion that modern academic studies "support" the trans cult of gender flexible ideology. But is this true? As critics have pointed out for years now, using professors like Jordan Peterson as an example, divergence from the mainstream progressive viewpoint often results in the condemnation of the person who questions this "science" using logical refutation of both the data and the premise of the studies. Why would an American take out tens of thousands of dollars in debt to get "cancelled" and be unable to find work in their field? Is it not a reasonable position to say that nobody is doing studies against progressive gender/sexuality claims due to fear of loss of reputation and employment?
In this study it is demonstrated that 88 out of 139 (63.3%) of the boys studied met the DSM-III, III-R, or IV criteria for gender identity disorder. The DSM is the book of "official mental diagnoses" by psychologists, and the labels are all decided by peer consensus not any kind of objective science. Of those 88 boys, when classified as either persisters (still trans) or desisters (identifies by biological sex) only 12.2% (17 boys) were classified as persisters (still met criteria of gender identity disorder) at follow-up. No gender affirming care was provided to anyone represented in this study during the time of the study.
This demonstrates that if you teach kids that gender is fluid and all consensual sexuality is valid, reinforcing their belief in these things as an inherent aspect of their identity, that they will see themselves as unnatural and flawed but unable to change. This is the dangerous mindset that has children wanting to mutilate their genitals and take hormones to permanently alter their bodies, but I do not believe that should be an available option. In the West we already accept that children having sex with adults is morally objectionable and regardless of the validity of such a moral argument it is inconsistent that we do not consider exposing kids to mature, adult content like pornography, drag, and exotic dancing to be an extension of such a moral principle.
Divorce and Abuse
Instantly, with the heading above, the Western mind is drawn to the idea of a woman who is divorcing her abusive husband. This is the result of the same "progressive" feminist, liberal indoctrination that is causing an epidemic of trans* identified and LGBT youth. What I actually am going to address is how divorce facilitates situations where children are vulnerable to abuse and ultimately has a correlation with the rise in sexual deviance and gender disorder.
According to the American Psychological Association, approximately 40-50% of first marriages end in divorce. The divorce rate for second marriages is even higher, with approximately 60-67% of second marriages ending in divorce. Source
So when divorces are at an all-time high and both parents are working with new partners at their respective homes how does such a system benefit the child who never asked to be born? It is parental duty to raise a kid even at the expensive of your own happiness, but instead we accept moral subjectivity and complete sexual liberty as crucial to the modern liberal worldview. But when new partners are around a child all of the time, is it any surprise children are getting abused in their own homes across the country?
A study on minority youth concluded that sexual minority individuals were on average 3.8 times more likely to experience sexual abuse, 1.2 times more likely to experience parental physical abuse, 1.7 more likely to be assaulted at school, and 2.4 times more likely to miss school through fear. Source
The variance is so small on parental physical abuse that obviously that isn't a causal effect towards sexual variance, however what this study did show was a real correlation between victims of sexual abuse and variance in sexuality. This confirms what many of us have been saying for a long time; that modern ideas of sexuality and gender are largely the result of traumatic sexual experience manifesting itself through mental illness and in the worst cases, through the continuation of the cycle when the child victim becomes the child predator.
As a Muslim my opinion on the matter is based on Quran not on modern academic studies, however I did not make this the focus of my argument as America does not accept religion as legitimate basis of law and for whatever reason does accept easily manipulatable university surveys as legitimate basis.
Another study confirmed a higher rate of both mental illness and sexual abuse being experienced by kids and teens who identified as LGBQ+
To be clear I believe if you support the American education system in it's current form that it is your right to send your kids there and I do not object to that. I only hope that you will understand some of my concerns and be as sympathetic in return to my position that I don't want my Muslim son going to one of these indoctrination centers.
Islam as the Remedy for Moral Bankruptcy
Not to attack my Christian brothers but the modern West is the result of the failure to defend and maintain religion and the replacement of that institution as the metric for morality by government. Except liberal government law changes constantly and is only based on the current dominant perspective on an issue regardless of objectivity. Although democratic republics claim to represent the will of the people through elections deciding who holds office, in practice this has not been any more accountable to the average American than a dictatorship or theocracy would be.
Now I know people will say "well you are from America, you don't know what life is like in other countries" and on a strictly personal level you would be correct. But just like you have no recourse when both major parties choose moderate, corrupt candidates in an election I would argue regardless of application the level of accountability is certainly higher in a society where the leader is just one person to be deposed rather than a federal system backed by a military industrial complex larger than the world has ever seen.
That is not to say I want to live in a dictatorship, but rather I want to live in theocratically run society where the guidelines of Sharia law are the only application of government. Sharia law has the solution for the vast majority of the West's modern ills: patriarchal power structures to curb promiscuity, legal protections to prevent rulers or patriarchs from abusing those around them, restriction of premarital sex and segregation of genders to support the institutions of marriage and family, prohibitions on drugs and alcohol to curb degenerate and adulterous urges, prohibition of porn to keep men focused on financial success to get married for sex, and the strict prohibition of immorality in public (premarital sex, adultery, nudity, etc) enforced on the highest standards of evidence required by Sharia.
Muslims believe in their religion and they do their best to follow it. Christians on the other hand have been corrupting their institution for decades conceding abortion, homosexuality, sodomy, adultery, and divorce as necessary evils that liberal secular law sees as less important than maximum individual personal freedom. The issue there is the logic, since it is not bound by any absolutes other than modern ideas of consent and personal individual freedom, can be used to justify things most people know are immoral (beastiality, necrophilia, pedophilia, self-destructive habits like drugs and gambling, etc.).
Comments